Spider-Man: Into the Spider- Verse Review

Just yesterday I saw Sony animation's latest flick Into the Spider-Verse. I was interested in the film since its first teaser this time last year and it kept looking more and more interesting as the months drew nearer to its release. 2018 seems to be the year for Spider-Man as he was in Infinity War, had the fastest selling PS4 game and also two spinoff films. So as you can tell this film had a lot to contend with, but it not only delivered it may have succeeded in being the best Spider-Man related film of the year.

The film focuses on a kid named Miles Morales who gets bitten by a radioactive spider in the subway. He coincidently stumbles onto  Spider-Man as he tries to stop the Kingpin from setting off a machine that is a portal to parallel universes. There is a big explosion and Spider-Man is then killed by the KingPin. Miles sees another Spider-Man and he explains he is from another universe, they team up to try and stop Kingpin but are outnumbered so try and find other Spider people and once they unite they can stop Kingpin and find a way to put the Spider people back to there respective universes.

The film also a strong cast both main and supporting. It features Shameik Moore as Miles Morales, Jake Johnson as Peter B. Parker/ Spiderman, Hailee Steinfeld as Gwen Stacey/ Spider Gwen, John Mulaney as Spider-Ham, Kimiko Glenn as Peni Parker and Nicholas Cage as Spider-Man Noir. It also has Lily Tomlin as Aunt May, Zoe Kravitz as Mary Jane, Brian Tee Henry as Jefferson Davis, Mashershala Ali as Aaron Davis/ The Prowler, Chris Pine as Peter Parker/ Spider-Man and Liev Schreiber as Kingpin.

As well as the cast the movie's animation is some of the most creative animations I think I've seen in any Hollywood animated feature film as it blends the comic style, cartoon style and anime style all in one to make some unique looking scenes. The film is also written as it has many elements from the comic books but it is understandable for people who have never read a comic book. An example of this the origins for all the Spider people as they are based on their comic book origins but narrows it down so you know who the character is without reading a single one of their comics. It also makes fun of things that have been seen in other Spider-Man films such as the weird dance in Spider-Man 3 and his catchphrase 'with power comes great responsibility'.

However, the film did fall flat in some areas. One of which was the use of a villain. There were a lot of villains in the film such as The Kingpin, The Prowler, The Green Goblin (voiced by Jorma Taccone), Doc Ock (voiced by Kathryn Hahn) and the Scorpion (voiced by Joaquin Coslo). But one of the most disappointing was Tombstone (voiced by Marvin Jones III), the only reason I found him disappointing is that he did nothing in the film apart from being the goofy character and didn't really affect the plot as much the other villains so he seemed a bit unnecessary to be in the movie, also the animation looked off in a few scenes which disturbed me a bit as it looked really weird.

But in conclusion Into the Spider-Verse is overall a good film to see and would recommend that you see it. The film's music is one of the strongest soundtracks I heard and easily competes with the soundtrack of Black Panther. Also, the film's score by Daniel Pemberton is just as good and makes every scene entertaining.

I would give Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse a 10/10 as it is a highly enjoyable film to watch, with great use of the animation and well-written characters that we get to know as the film progresses.

Die Hard Franchise Review: A Good Day to Die Hard

We are now nearing the holiday season and as I haven't finished my Die Hard series review I decided that I should finish it off. So today I will be reviewing the last film in the franchise (for now at least) A Good Day to Die Hard or Die Hard 5. For this instalment, I will be talking about what worked and what didn't as this entry is known as the weakest but it does try and separate itself from the rest of the series.

The movie's plot goes as follows, John McClane goes to Russia in order to free his son Jack McClane (Jai Courtney), he discovers that Jack is a CIA operative who is apart of a mission to stop an undercover organisation in Russia. Both John and Jack join forces to stop this organisation. From this plot, it sounds interesting and focuses on the son as the last one focused on the daughter but what really drags this done is Jai Courtney's performance as he doesn't do much apart from calling his dad a jerk and what not and shoot people for good measure. The character comes across as bland and uninteresting and is a weak part of the film for me.

The films cast is ok, the only returning characters are John McClane and Lucy McClane. The film's villain is Komarov played by Sebastian Koch. For most of the movie, he is portrayed as a man who was convicted because he had a falling out with a politician. This already sounds interesting but the problem with this is that he doesn't work as a villain, reasons why are that he is not a villain for very long and he comes across as weak. The film's director this time around is John Moore who is known for films such as Max Payne, The Omen (2006) and Behind Enemy Lines. Moore tries his best to make something different out of this film but at times it comes off as unrecognisable as a Die Hard movie and becomes a bland action movie.

The lighting as well is quite bland with very bleak colours and makes the film look dull and boring. The camera work is pretty standard with not many unique shots. It mainly has long shots, mid shots and close ups. These two things don't work well at all as it makes the movie look quite boring which is not what the Die Hard Franchise is meant to be.

However, the movie does have its good moments. Such as the Cab driver played by Pasha D. Lychnikoff as he is a likeable character and has quite good chemistry with John McClane for the little time we see him on screen. John McClane is still a strong point for this film but the problem in this film is that he feels more of a background character as he moans He is on Vacation and seems to be a weaker portrayal than the other films which I think is more of a writing problem than Bruce Willis's acting.

Overall, A Good Day to Die Hard tries to be different from the other films but the pay off backfires miserably. It has its moments but is the worst film in the series as it comes across as bland and boring and has a lot of weak characters. With the next Die Hard, a prequel titled McClane with Die Hard 4 director Len Wiseman set to direct, the Franchise might have a saving grace.

I would give A Good Day to Die Hard a 5/10- as it is a bleak and boring movie with very few good moments.

Die Hard Franchise Review: Live Free or Die Hard

Its been over a week since my last review of the franchise and today I will be reviewing the penultimate (or at least for now) movie in the franchise, Live Free or Die Hard or Die Hard 4.0 as some call it. In my opinion, this movie isn't that bad although it moved to a lower rating than the last three it blends in with the modern action movie pretty well.

But that's what I think and in this review, I will be discussing why. The film takes 12 years after the previous entry in the franchise and acts as both a continuation and a kind of soft reboot to the character, I mean slightly there's not much difference from McClane's character from the previous movies.

The movie's plot is a group of hackers decide to hack into every security service in America starting a firewall or something like that which will make the country and the world defenceless. McClane joins forces with a young hacker called Matt Farrell played by Justin Long and together with the help of the FBI must take down the villain Thomas Gabriel from achieving this. The movie's cast goes as Bruce Willis as John McClane, Justin Long as Matt Farrell, Mary Elizabeth Winstead as Lucy McClane, Cliff Curtis as FBI Deputy Director Miguel Bowman, Timothy Olyphant as Thomas Gabriel and Kevin Smith, yes Kevin Smith as Frederick "Warlock" Davis.

Now on to the good parts of the movie. It fits well with the modern action movie really well as it does not try to change the premise of Die Hard but instead adapts it to the modern world and how McClane's world gets bigger. It also makes McClane what he was in the first movie by muttering how he has found himself in this situation. Also, the villain is good as he has a motivation for his actions and that he has also designed most of them builds up his threat level as well. The supporting characters like Matt and Lucy are done well also as it shows a relatable side to McClane.

However, there are some bad parts to his movie. The FBI's role in the film is a bit out of place as they don't really do anything. The movie doesn't have the same feel like the other three as it closed off as a trilogy, and it feels a bit weird to have the other 2 movies hence a soft reboot and also it could do more if it did not go to a lower rating.

But saying that, the fourth entry is an enjoyable ride, with entertaining action scenes, decent CGI for its time and also John McClane is just one of the best protagonists to come out of any action movie as his character doesn't really change much which doesn't make him too complicated.

I would give Live Free or Die Hard a 7/10- For an entertaining and action-packed continuation of the franchise. But it doesn't feel quite the same.

Die Hard Franchise review: Die Hard with a Vengeance

Now its time to do another review and instead of doing a horror movie in time for Halloween, I'm going to review the next instalment of the Die Hard Franchise. Die Hard with a Vengeance or Die Hard 3 for short was released five years after the 2nd film and in my opinion is the second best entry in the franchise as a whole. The film sees John McTiernan back in the directing chair and the only character to come back is Bruce Willis as John McClane and also it's not set at Christmas time. Does the setting affect the series? considering the other two after this film were fine with the setting no it did not affect the series as it showed John McClane doing his job in the streets of New York. There are other places in the series but we'll cross that bridge when we get there.

The film's narrative is Die Hard in the open world, so New York is under a bomb threat and only Mclane with the help of Zeus (Samuel L Jackson) they come together to stop the brother of first villains antagonist Hans Gruber's brother Simon Gruber played by Jeremy Irons. The film's cast is quite strong like the other two films. Joining Willis we have Zeus played by Samuel L Jackson, Graham Green as Joe Lambert, Larry Bryggman as Inspector Walter Cobbs, Sam Phillips as Katya and Jeremy Irons as Simon Peter Gruber.

Now on to the good parts of the movie. The relationship between McClane and Zeus is great as they are not very fond of each other at first and then grow to like each other at the climax of the movie, also its got Samuel L Jackson. I mean what role of his isn't the best part of the movie. The antagonist is good as well, he doesn't act much of an emotional threat considering there is no loved one of either Mclane or Zeus but he is definitely a physical threat and does have some similarities to his brother. The effects aren't bad for this movie as there is no CGI, or at least that I could see. And it was mostly practical. Also, John McTiernan is back as the director and expands on McClane relationship with holly and also the relationship with Zeus as well. He also does a good job with the Antagonists motivation for stopping McClane as it is personal and does it in a way similar to his brother.

However, it does have its downs. One of them is the police, the reason I have a problem I have with them is that act dumb which is Cliche that has been done to death. I also find it weird that they don't help McClane out that much as they arrive at the end of every explosion to listen to Simons new orders. Also, the side antagonists are kind of bland as well as they don't do much to the movie's narrative and are just there to make the antagonists look more threatening.

Overall, Die Hard 3 is a good addition to the franchise, although it might not have the charm of the original. It still has strong relationships and doesn't take itself too seriously as a film. And also it has Sam Jackson.

I would give Die Hard with a Vengeance a 7/10- Good direction and use effects, strong relationships between characters but it isn't quite like the original.

Die Hard Franchise Review: Die Hard 2: Die Harder

Now it is time to talk about the second instalment in the franchise. Die Hard 2 is considered one of the weaker films to be released in the franchise. The problem I have with the movie and many others is it is just the first film just in an airport. However, the film does have a few good moments so in this review I will try to highlight what I think works and what doesn't.

The film's plot is the same as the first but with an airport in peril instead of crooks taking over a building. However, it does have new characters and that's about it. That was short, might as well talk about the cast. The film has a some of the characters from the first such as Bruce Willis, Bonnie Bedelia, William Atherton and Reginald VelJohnson. But it does have some new characters like William Sadler as the villain Col. Stuart, Franco Nero as General Roman Esperanza and features John Leguizamo and Robert Patrick as a henchman.

Now to get on to the good parts. The comedy is well done and probably on the same level as the first, which is a good sign. The comedy is mainly done by Dennis Franz as Capt. Carmine Lorenzo and Robert Costanzo as the characters brother Sgt. Vito Lorenzo, they do the comedy well as they are sarcastic and don't take the situation seriously until the stakes get higher. The Director this time is Renny Harlin who has directed films such as Deep Blue Sea and The Long Kiss Goodnight. Renny does a good job of producing his version of Die Hard but for a sequel, it's just ok because it is the exact same as the previous film.


And now the bad parts. I know I have gone on to say that it is basically the first film done a little differently, the worst part is that it makes fun of being a cardboard copy of the previous film. It also returns characters that didn't really need to be in it. An example of this is William Atherton's character Richard Thornburg as his purpose in the film is the same as the first and the film doesn't expand on anything else on his character apart from that he's an annoying reporter. 

However, having said all of this Die Hard 2 is an average sequel that doesn't really expand on much from its predecessor. It has recognisable characters, it's entertaining and funny, but it is almost identical to the one before I mean they even play 'Let it snow' by Dean Martin at the end of the film just like the first one.

I would give Die Hard 2 a 6/10- It's just as entertaining as the first but it's an average sequel that doesn't try to expand from the first film.

Die Hard Franchise Review: Die Hard

As you can tell from the title I will be reviewing all five films in the Die Hard franchise. So having said that, I will be reviewing the first and best entry in the franchise 'Die Hard' released in 1988. Die Hard is a film that not only redefined the action genre, labelled as the action movie and also made Bruce Willis a household name. But is the film worth being labelled all this? well yes it does and in this review, I'll be talking about the elements I think make this film a worthwhile watch.

The film has a simple narrative of a cop based in New York goes to LA to visit his family for Christmas, He stops at a building where his wife works to take her home, the building is holding an office party and has to wait till it over, while a band of crooks take over the building while the cop has to stop them. What makes this narrative so memorable is that it is not too complicated like some of the action movies at that time, and allows for some great character moments between characters.

The cast of the film has many names such as Bruce Willis who plays legendary action hero John Mclane, Bonnie Bedelia as his wife Holly, Reginald VelJohnson as Sgt. Powell, William Atherton as the reporter Richard Thornburg and the late Alan Rickman as legendary villain Hans Gruber. The film's director is John McTiernan who is known for directing other famous films such as Predator and Last Action Hero. McTiernan was a good choice to direct this as he understands the narrative and there are some great character and action moments in the story as a result of this. In my opinion, he also is the best director in the franchise as he came back to do the second best film in my opinion which was Die Hard with a Vengence.

Now onto the good parts of this film, the relationship between John and Holly is well done as you understand where their marital status is and how the relationship changes over the course of the movie. The antagonist is really good as he acts as both an emotional and physical threat to the protagonist as his wife is one of the many hostages he has taken. 

Another good part of the movie is the comedy, Bruce Willis used to be in comedy before he did Die Hard and his experience shows that as there scenes in the movie of him talking to himself saying 'how did this happen?' and 'why am I doing this?' which makes him not too funny and not too serious at the same time as he realises how the whole situation he is in is a bit goofy.

However, as much as I like this movie there is a few nitpicks that are fairly visible. One of these being the hostages. The problem I have with the hostages is that there just there for plot reasons and that's it, an example of this is one hostage named Ellis who tries to make a deal with the crooks but then gets shot as a result of his stupidity. Another is the Limo driver as although he is very funny in all the scenes he's in, that's his only purpose throughout the movie and does one heroic deed near the film's climax.

But overall, Die Hard is an entertaining action movie with a simple narrative, great character moments, great action scenes and Bruce Willis making fun of how the plot is a bit goofy.

I would give Die Hard a 9/10 for great character and action scenes, a simple and understandable narrative behind it and a great villain.

Venom review

Hello again,
This is the first blog I've done for many months now so I thought I'd review a film I recently saw at the cinema. As you can tell from the title I saw Sony's latest flick Venom, if you've been on the internet lately you will know that Venom hasn't got great reviews and I think there being a bit unfair with those bad reviews. I'm not going to say that the movie is amazing because it's not but the director and everyone involved did the best they can to make the movie the best it could be and it does pay off in the final cut. Another reason is that the character of Spider-Man is quite important in the origin of Venom as he is the reason that they symbiote exists and the reason why he hates the wall-crawler alongside Eddie Brock who finds out his secret identity.

The film's story starts off with a space crash a bit like his origin in the Spider-Man animated series in the 90's. Police see that all the crew on the ship are dead and collect the packages that they came back to earth to deliver to a man named Carlton Drake (Riz Ahmed). In San Francisco, Eddie Brock (Tom Hardy) is about to interview Carlton about his illegal experiments. He gets fired from his job as a reporter and gets dumped by his girlfriend Anne (Michelle Williams) who got fired from her job as she was the holder of this information. 6 months have passed and Drake decided to experiment on the packages which he calls Symbiotes, one of his doctors tells Eddie of this and he decides to investigate further. He accidentally gets attacked and one of the symbiotes goes into his body. After adjusting to his new body he meets the symbiote inside of him who calls himself Venom (also voiced by Hardy) and together they stop Drake who gets consumed by a symbiote called Riot to get more of these symbiotes which will take over the planet.

Now for the advantages of this movie. Although this movie might be a bit of mess in parts, there was a lot of concepts that I liked in the movie. One of them was Venom himself as he his like Eddie's inner voice and can also take control of his body which is quite interesting and a bit scary when you think about it. He is also very cocky calling Eddie a loser and a bit of a wimp, however, he can be violent as he does like to bite heads off of people who attack him. The voice is impressive as well as Hardy disguises his voice in a way that you think is that Tom Hardy? I can't tell and that could be said for Ahmed as well for his performance as Riot.

The fight scenes were well choreographed although there's not many in the film and also the effect is decent as well. The CGI makes Venom look different from any other version we have seen him on before as he looks both frightening yet comic accurate at the same time. Howvever there is a lot of things I did not like such as the pacing. The reason I don't like the pacing is that it felt off and made the film very inconsistent which makes the film become a total mess. I also didn't like the villain as he is kind of forgettable and doesn't really do much when he is probably included in the film's narrative. The beginning of the film was really boring and didn't really establish much apart from Eddie's a loser and Drake's the bad guy.

In conclusion, Venom is a bit of a mess, it has pacing issues and can be hard to follow at times however it is an enjoyable film to watch and the portrayal of Venom is much better than Topher Grace's performance in Spider-Man 3 which is considered to be one of the weakest Spider-Man movies out there. It has opened up for a possible sequel with another popular Symbiote but I won't spoil that for anyone who wants to see this movie.

I would give Venom a 6/10- Has a lot of good elements in it and is an enjoyable movie however it has a lot of pacing problems making it a bit of a mess.

Solo: A Star Wars Story review

So yesterday I went to see the new Star Wars film Solo. I was worried about this film as it went through production hell such as it got a different director and had numerous reshoots. It also had a mixed casting choice in Alden Ehrenreich as Han Solo himself and also the division of the fanbase which has led a war between die-hard fans of the franchise and comparing the new film's sales to Marvel's massive box office. But after all this controversy the film as came out and it is a fairly safe movie.

The movie centres on a Young Han Solo and tells the story of his first heist, his history with the Empire, how he met Chewbacca, how he got his surname (yep Solo is not his surname), how he won the Falcon of Lando and how he got his blaster the DL-44. Which some topics have been covered in the comics beforehand. The movie starts off with Han and his friend/lover Qi'ra played by Game of Thrones actress Emilia Clarke escaping their homeworld of Corellia, unfortunately, things go south as Qi'ra gets captured and Han joins the Imperial Navy. Three years later he is imprisoned by the Empire and meets a Wookie who we all know is Chewbacca played by Joonas Suomato. They then join forces with Tobias Beckett played by Woody Harrelson to still some Coaxium off an Imperial crate train. This plan does not go so well and there are a few loses. They eventually meet up with the main villain Dyrden Vos played by Paul Bettany who tells them to go to Kessel to get some Coaxium but instructs his top lieutenant Qi'ra to join them. And you can guess the rest of the story from there.

The movie is not a trainwreck as many people thought it would be but there are more bad parts than good in this movie. But let's cover the good the casting was ok overall such as Alden does a good Han Solo, however, his performance is nowhere near the outstanding work of Harrison Ford, Donald Glover/Childish Gambino does a spot on performance of Lando Calrissian as in he is like a younger version of Billy Dee Williams, Joonas Suomato is great as Chewbacca. There are some entertaining scenes in the movie and the Kessel Run scene is the standout scene apart from one scene which I will cover later so spoiler warning. Also, another good thing that the movie has a different tone to other Star Wars movies which makes it unique and different but I think it will be remembered for the wrong reasons which leads me to the bad stuff. Apart from the characters I've mentioned some of them are just ok such as Qi'ra, the villain is bland and seems pointless to the plot at points. Also, Enfys Nest is a pointless character which is a shame as the trailer set her up to be the big bad of the film. The film can feel rushed at the beginning and takes a while to get quite exciting.

But there is one character that was the worst part of this movie and that was L3-37 played by Phoebe Waller-Bridge. Her character is annoying and ruins the whole cocky droid thing that Disney has started since the Force Awakens, so instead, she is just annoying and just seems pointless to the plot but thankfully we don't see her for very long. Also, C-3PO and R2-D2 are not in this movie which kind of makes sense to the plot of the movie but also seem like a crime as they both have appeared in all 9 Star Wars films prior to this one.

Some of the Movies best scenes are in the third act where Han and Qi'ra plan to stop Dryden Vos once and for all. Before I continue there are a few spoilers here so please read on to the next paragraph. Once Dryden is killed by Qi'ra she takes his ring and contacts his boss which is revealed to be Darth Maul played by Ray Park and voiced by Star Wars: The Clone Wars and Star Wars: Rebels actor Sam Witwer. Also another fact that there are some actors from Rebels who came back for this movie such as Steve Blum returning to voice the Storm Troopers which apparently he did in the previous anthology film Rogue One.

Overall Solo: A Star Wars Story is a very safe movie with a very basic plot attached to it. It has some great special effects and scenes but it doesn't have the courage to expand upon topics that it vaguely covers such as Han and Qi'ra's relationship and Hans Imperial History.

However, taking all of this into account I would give Solo: A Star Wars Story a 6/10: Very basic plot and doesn't take enough risks that could make the film more interesting which overall makes it an average Star Wars film.

Avengers: Infinity War Review

Yesterday I went to see the latest instalment of the MCU. This has been set up for around 6 years and now it has finally arrived to the big screen and has been a result of almost every Marvel film since the first Avengers back in 2012. This movie is probably the most hyped and biggest movie Marvel has ever produced and they did not disappoint in both the hype and the quality.

The story of the movie is that Thanos a powerful being from the planet Titan is on a quest to search for all six Infinity Stones and once he finds all he can wipe out half of the universe. He sends his minions known as the Black Order to search for the stones on earth and The Avengers and The Guardians of the Galaxy must join forces to face Thanos and stop him from obtaining all the Infinity Stones and changing the universe.

The cast is the biggest Marvel has ever had in the movie so I will split them into the teams and other minor characters that are in the movie. So from the Avengers, we have Robert Downey Jr as Iron Man, Chris Evans as Steve Rodgers/ Captain America, Chris Hemsworth as Thor, Mark Ruffalo as Bruce Banner/ The Hulk, Scarlett Johansson as Natasha Romanoff/ Black Widow, Anthony Mackie as Sam Wilson, Elizabeth Olsen as Wanda Maximoff/ Scarlett Witch, Jeremy Renner as Clint Barton/ Hawkeye, Sebastian Stan as Bucky Barnes/ The winter soldier, Paul Rudd as Scott Lang/ Ant-Man, Benedict Cumberbatch as Doctor Stephen Strange, Tom Holland as Peter Parker/ Spider-Man and Chadwick Boseman as King T'Challa/ Black Panther Don Cheadle as James Rhodes/ War Machine and Paul Bettany as Vision.

From the Guardians of the Galaxy, Chris Pratt as Peter Quill/ Star-Lord, Zoe Saldana as Gamora, Dave Bautista as Drax the Destroyer, Bradley Cooper as Rocket Raccoon, Vin Diesel as Teenage Groot, Pom Klementieff as Mantis and Karen Gillian as Nebula. From The Black Order, Tom Vaughan Lawlor as Ebony Maw, Carrie Coon as Proxima Midnight, Micheal James Shaw as Corvus Glave and Terry Notary as Cull Obsidian/ Black Dwarf. Other characters include Gywenth Paltrow as Pepper Potts, Idris Elba as Heimdall, Tom Hiddleston as Loki, Danai Gurira as Okoye, Peter Dinklage as Eitri, Benedict Wong as Wong, Benicio Del Toro as The Collector, William Hurt as Thaddeus Ross, Winston Duke as M'Baku, Letitia Wright as Shuri, Florence Kasumba as Ayo, Ross Marquand as the Stonekeeper and of course Josh Brolin as Thanos.

Well, that is a heck load of characters in the film. now time for some things that the film did really well was the chemistry between all the characters such as Thor with the Guardians and Spider-Man and Doctor Strange, Iron Man and Star-Lord work well together also. It also has Villian that may be the best in the MCU in my opinion, We all know that Marvel has had a big Villian problem with some being amazing such as Loki, The Vulture and Erik Kilmonger and other just being plain forgetful such as Malkeith, Ronan the Accuser and Yellow Jacket. Thanos is different from all those, as he has been set up as the big bad for six years, although the fans make fun of him as aside from this movie he hasn't done anything that antagonising we all knew he would make a big impact on the MCU and boy did they do that. Not only did he change the MCU forever we also had a look at the emotional side to him such as his motive to change the universe and his past actions to his daughter Gamora.

However no matter how good a movie is there will always be its downsides. The movie is undoubtedly the longest MCU movie to date having a runtime of 2hrs and 30 mins and sometimes the scenes could drag and make the movie seem longer than it actually is but there was enough in the movie to actually make the movie not seem boring such as the final battle in Wakanda. Another is also the CGI was unfinished in some scenes which seem to be a common mistake in the MCU, although the CGI was good in most scenes you were able to tell what scenes had good CGI and which didn't.

In Conclusion, the Film has its downsides to it but it has enough good things to it that the downsides seem like minor things that are occurring in the film, It has enough jokes in the movie to make it not seem plain boring like the DCEU before Wonder Woman and Justice League. The chemistry of all the characters is amazing and they all have an equal balance of screen time although some do have more than others. But I am excited to see what happens next after Ant-Man and the Wasp and Captain Marvel as they are based during or before the events of both Infinity War or The MCU as a whole.

But Overall I would give Infinity War a 10/10- For amazing character and amazing emotional moments, some unexpected twists, a worthy villain that has been set up for a while and a climax with a huge impact to future movies and would like to see what happens next.

HAPPY TEN YEARS MARVEL STUDIOS

Psycho review

So yesterday I went to a screening at my local drama centre, it was a horror film and as my upcoming project for college is a horror opening I decided to go and see what it was. The film they showed was Alfred Hitchcock's classic Psycho. The film is more of a thriller than a horror as there are not as many scares in the film.

The story starts in Phoenix, Arizona where a girl named Marion talks to her boyfriend about leaving to pursue a better life. She goes to work later that day and a man about to buy the building she works for gives her $40,000 to put in the bank. she pretends she is ill and steals the money. She is then caught being suspicious by many people like the police and the car salesman. She stops at a place called 'Bates Motel' where she gets a room after they have a talk about Norman Bates's mother problem. She starts having a shower until she is murdered by 'Mrs Bates'. A week later a P.I turns up due to her suspicious disappearance, he later gets murdered and that leads Marion's sister and boyfriend to go to the motel and try to see what is wrong. Marion's sister founds Mrs Bates's corpse, Norman tries to kill her and then is stopped and after that, he is sent to prison. The story ends with the police finding the car with Marion's body and the $40,000 inside.

That's the story out the way, now for the cast. The cast had stars such as Anthony Perkins as Norman Bates, Janet Leigh as Marion, Vera Miles as Marion's sister Lila, John Gavin as Marion's boyfriend Sam and Paul Jasmin as the voice of Mrs Bates.

Some of the camerawork had a lot of impressive shots such as the freaky close-up shots and they also had a clever use of lighting which made it more effective in black and white than it would be in colour.

Overall Psycho is a film that is a classic example of a thriller. It has impressive shots and angles and a great use of lighting. However, the film has aged a little due to it being released 57 years ago so not all the scares are as terrifying as they were back then. However, the ending is freaky with Norman in his cell with the voice of his mother in the back round.

I would give Psucho a 9/10- Impressive camerawork and lighting, not all the scenes have a big impact on the audience anymore.

Darkest Hour review

Welcome back, everyone.

The most boring month of the year is drawing to a close. As apart of the last weekend of the month till another year I decided to review a film that at the moment has won lead actor Gary Oldman a lot of awards, yes I'm talking about Darkest Hour.

The film starts in the first year of the Second World War and Neville Chamberlain is booted out of Parliament for allowing Hitler to invade Poland, his party is forced into electing a new Prime Minister for a new coalition Government. Churchill is elected due to him be the favourite of the opposition so he should work well with them. The film covers two events in the war which are Germany's invasion of Europe and the Dunkirk crisis where the whole British Army could have been demolished by the hands of the Nazi's. With Britain in a lot of trouble, Churchill is struggling to decide what is best for the country as there is a temptation for peace talks with Mussolini one of Hitler's most trusted allies.

The film could be nothing without it's cast as it has some strong actors such as Gary Oldman as Churchill, Kristin Scott Thomas as his wife Clementine Churchill, Lily James as his typist Elizabeth Layton and Ben Mendelsohn as King George VI. There also some other minor roles such as Ronald Pickup as Neville Chamberlain and Stephen Dillane as Lord Halifax.

The film expresses Churchills personality very well and you forget that he is Prime Minister as the film portrays him as a man who is trying to do what is best for the people. The film also as a lot of good moments between Churchill and Layton as they both trust each other and become good friends by the end of the movie.

What I found that was interesting was that no one believed that Churchill would be good and would resign leading to a vote of no confidence to do the peace talks, Once that looks like it will happen Churchill strikes back by talking to Parliament saying that England 'will never surrender' which leads both sides to agree and the rest is history.

I would give Darkest Hour a 10/10 good performances throughout which made the film enjoyable to watch.

Star Wars: The Last Jedi Review

Hi everyone happy new year,

I know it's been a while since I have reviewed a film as per usual but I thought I'd start up again by doing the latest addition to the Star Wars Saga (if it's still called that). This movie has had many good reviews calling it the "Best Star Wars yet", the audience, however, are debating if the film is good or that its bad. People have been calling it bad due it being more of an end of a trilogy than a sequel. So without a further doubt let's continue with the review.

The film takes place a few minutes after the Force Awakens and the Resistance are desperately escaping the clutches of the First Order. As the Resistance are about to finish there evacuation the First Order have found them and start to wipe them from Existence. On the other side of the Galaxy Rey (Daisy Ridley) has found the location of Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) on the island of Ahch-To where there was once a Jedi Temple until destroyed by Ben Solo or as he is known Kylo Ren (Adam Driver). After being tracked through light speed the Resistance are trying desperately to find a new base without being stopped by General Hux (Domhnall Gleeson) and the First Order. Poe (Oscar Isaacs) has a plan to get someone to stop the First Order from tracking them by shutting the core down on Supreme Leader Snoke's (Andy Serkis) star destroyer. Finn (John Boyega) and a new character named Rose (Kelly Marie Tran)  go to a planet called Canto Bite where they find a hacker named DJ (Benicio Del Toro) who help them on to the star destroyer before betraying them for an award. The plan fails so the Resistance evacuates to a planet called Crait where they hide until Rey comes back to help fight and get them out of the First Order's clutches.

That is the whole story of the film. So what did I think of it? I thought it is a pretty decent film, I understand why people hate it as there is a lot of unanswered questions such as Snoke's Identity as he is killed off in his second scene in the flesh. The good things I thought that it had an interesting use of two separate stories that link together at the end, they gave Poe a bigger part as he was forgotten about in the last film, Carrie Fisher had a bittersweet part and also Yoda was back. However, like all films, there are also bad things such as Snoke's part in the whole film, the Canto Bite scene, The fact it had a lot of unnecessary jokes which make it more of a Marvel Movie than a Star Wars Movie, Also Luke's personality and that he shied away from the force. Also an extra mention to the film's ending, the ending is a small child who we saw a scene prior for a second, looking at the resistance leaving through the Millenium Falcon and for some reason he has the force. Why. Rogue One has a more satisfying ending with the Darth Vader scene.

Now there were things that I did find weird in the movie as well one was the blue milk coming out of this seal on the island as it was awkward and added nothing to the plot, C-3PO had a Gold Arm,This is awkward for me it looked like he had a red arm for most of the 30 years before the Force Awakens so the fact that this film takes place literally after the destruction of Star Killer Base why has his arm gone back to gold, Also the falcon wasn't flown with Han Solo as he is mostly with the ship and the fact the character is no longer with was a little bit heartbreaking. But then again the new Solo Movie is coming May this year so we'll see how that will turn out.

But the main question people want an answer to the most is what did I think of the Porg's? Honestly, nothing much they seemed to waste a lot of time that could have been added to certain characters they were good as they had a funny relationship with Chewbacca (Joonas Suotamo not Peter Mayhew) also R2-D2 was played by Jimmy Vee as Kenny Baker unfortunately died.

So overall I'd  give the Last Jedi an 8.5/10 good movie, not the best executed.